The primary goal of the MDA's pesticide groundwater monitoring is to provide detailed information on the occurrence and concentrations of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater resources. Protection of Minnesota's citizens and water resources from agricultural chemicals is the fundamental purpose of this goal. The program focus is monitoring vulnerable groundwater in the agricultural and urban areas of the state.

Map illustrates the location of the groundwater sampling sites in 2025. Sampling sites include domestic wells, monitoring wells, urban wells, and springs.

 

Background

In 1987, the Minnesota Legislature amended the Minnesota Pesticide Control Law. It directed the MDA to determine the impact of pesticides on the environment, including the impacts on surface water and groundwater.

In response to this charge, the MDA initiated a pesticide groundwater monitoring program in 1987 and in 1991, began surface water monitoring. The MDA has one of the most comprehensive pesticide monitoring programs in the country.

Groundwater Monitoring Results for 2025

In 2025, the MDA’s ambient monitoring program sampled 167 monitoring wells, naturally occurring springs and private drinking water wells throughout the state for pesticides.

  • 142 were shallow monitoring wells.
  • 13 were naturally occurring springs.
  • 12 were private drinking water wells.
  • In total, 227 sample collection events resulted in 227 GC-MS/MS, 227 LC-MS/MS, and 71 GAG LC-MS/MS samples.
  • Fifty-seven of the 185 pesticides or pesticide degradates analyzed were detected.
  • Three of the 185 pesticides or pesticide degradates analyzed had a detection at a concentration above an applicable MDH drinking water reference value.
    • Eight samples from PMR 4 had a concentration of 4-hydroxychlorothalonil greater than the drinking water Risk Assessment Advice (RAA) of 2,000 ng/L. Six additional samples had a concentration of 4-hydroxychlorothalonil greater than 50% of (but not exceeding) the RAA.
    • One sample from PMR 10A had a total cyanazine (summation of cyanazine and associated degradates) concentration greater than the chronic drinking water Health Risk Limit (HRL) of 1,000 ng/L. Two additional samples from 1 spring in PMR 9 had a total cyanazine concentration greater than 50% of (but not exceeding) the chronic drinking water HRL.
    • One sample from PMR 5 had a concentration of total sulfentrazone, as well as sulfentrazone parent, greater than the drinking water Health Based Value (HBV) of 60,000 ng/L.
  • Pesticide degradates usually had higher detection frequencies compared to parent pesticides.

    • The greatest detection frequency for the parent pesticides, on an individual analyte basis, included: clothianidin (50%), fomesafen (18%), sulfentrazone (18%), bentazon (17%), and thiamethoxam (10%).
    • The greatest detection frequency for the pesticide degradates, on an individual analyte basis, included: metolachlor ESA (89%), metolachlor OXA (55%), acetochlor ESA (53%), alachlor ESA (27%), and dimethenamid ESA (19%).
  • Glufosinate, glyphosate, and AMPA were not detected in 71 groundwater samples. These analytes have not been detected in Minnesota groundwater by the MDA since analysis began. Glyphosate and AMPA analysis began in 2014, while glufosinate analysis began in 2022.

Common Detection Pesticides

"Common detection" is an official state designation made by the MDA Commissioner of Agriculture and is defined as “detection of a pollutant that is not due to misuse or unusual or unique circumstances but is likely to be the result of normal use of a product or a practice” (Minn. Stat. § 103H.005, Subd. 5). Groundwater common detection status is a useful tool to communicate to all involved parties that the normal use of a product or practice has resulted in its presence in groundwater and triggers a proactive approach to focus limited resources on pesticides which may adversely impact Minnesota’s resources. Pesticides, and select degradates, that have been designated as “common detection” receive heightened scrutiny from the MDA during reporting of monitoring results. Acetochlor, alachlor, atrazine, metolachlor, and metribuzin are the current common detection pesticides. Atrazine, metolachlor, and metribuzin were designated in 2002. Acetochlor and alachlor were designated in 2003.

The graph below shows how frequently the five pesticides were found in groundwater samples. Detection frequency includes both the original pesticide and its breakdown products, known as degradates.

Statewide groundwater common detection pesticides 90th percentile concentration as a percentage of the reference value

 

We use the 90th percentile to focus on the higher-end concentrations in the dataset. The 90th percentile value is greater than the concentrations found in 90% of groundwater samples, but lower than those in the top 10%. These values were then compared to reference levels for each pesticide. Reference values indicate the concentration at which a pesticide may pose a human health risk. The graph below shows the 90th percentile concentrations as a percentage of their respective reference values.

Statewide groundwater common detection pesticides 90th percentile concentration as a percentage of the reference value. These 90th percentiles are all far below the Health Reference Values for drinking water, most are below 1%. The 90th percentile for Didealkylatrazine is less than 4% of the reference value.

Data Availability and Future Work

All of the pesticide data collected as part of the MDA's ambient monitoring program is publicly available through the Water Quality Portal or the MDA Pesticide Water Quality Monitoring StoryMap. The MDA will continue to improve its program to expand monitoring to new locations and to include additional pesticide analytes, as resources and needs permit. The MDA is committed to maintaining its long-term data record to allow for continued assessment of the impacts of pesticides on groundwater from routine use.