2026 Dicamba Update

On February 6, the EPA approved federal registrations for the following dicamba products: Engenia®, Stryax™, and Tavium®. The new registrations are for over-the-top (OTT) use on dicamba-tolerant (DT) soybeans for the 2026 and 2027 growing seasons. Mitigation measures are required to reduce drift, minimize volatility, and protect ecosystems. As in previous years, state specific restrictions will be in place for OTT applications of Engenia®, Stryax™, and Tavium® in Minnesota. (See full MDA press release)

Dicamba is a selective systemic herbicide for post-emergence control of broadleaf weeds. It was first registered by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1967 and is available in several formulations (see table below). Dicamba is registered for use on a variety of food and feed crops, including corn, barley, wheat, and dicamba tolerant (DT) soybeans. It is also used to control weeds in turf including lawns, golf courses, sports fields, and parks.

Prior to 2016, dicamba in soybeans was restricted to only preplant and preharvest applications. However, since then the US EPA approved post-emergence, or over-the-top (OTT) use for specific dicamba products (Engenia®, XtendiMax™, Tavium®) on dicamba-tolerant (DT) soybeans and cotton.

Pesticide TypeHerbicide (Group 4)
Chemical ClassBenzoic Acid
Common Trade Names*Engenia®, Stryax™, and Tavium®
Registration StatusEPA: Registered since 1967, new Over-The-Top products are registered until February 6, 2028
MN: Registered
Structure
Chemical structure of dicamba

*No endorsement is implied in the referencing of trade names.


Drift, Forms of Dicamba, How it Works, and Use in Minnesota

Dicamba is a highly volatile chemical that can damage non-target plant species through spray drift (particle drift) and/or volatilization (vapor drift). New formulations were designed to reduce volatility. However, since OTT dicamba was registered for use on DT soybeans, the MDA has received complaints for off-site movement onto neighboring property. 

Annual Total Reports for Alleged Dicamba Drift

YearNumber of Reports
20250
20242
202315
202232
2021304
2020128
201920
201851
2017249
Dicamba FormCAS # /
PC code
Trade Names*Soybean OTT Products
Acid1918-00-9
029801
Celius; Vision;
Saddle-Up
none
Dimethylamine (DMA) salt2300-66-5
029802
Banvel; EndRun;
Cimarron Max
none
Sodium (Na) salt1982-69-0
029806
Status; Rave;
Overdrive
none
Potassium (K) salt10007-85-9
129043
Lawn 3iP
Herbicide
none
Diglycolamine (DGA) salt104040-79-1
128931
Clarity; DiFlexx;
Clarifier
Stryax
Tavium
Bis aminopropyl methylamine (BAPMA) salt100094EngeniaEngenia

*No endorsement is implied in the referencing of trade names.

Dicamba is a systemic herbicide that functions as a plant growth regulator. Following application, dicamba is absorbed through leaves and roots of target weeds and is translocated throughout the plant. In the plant, dicamba mimics auxin, a type of plant hormone, and causes abnormal cell division and growth.

Dicamba belongs to the benzoic acid chemical class and is a Site-of-Action 4 herbicide. Other herbicides belonging to Group 4 (synthetic auxins) with a similar mode-of-action include 2,4-D, MCPA, clopyralid, halauxifen-methyl, and aminopyralid.

In Minnesota agriculture, dicamba is used to control weeds in crops including corn, small grain, soybeans, and hay, as well as on fallow cropland, pastures, and land enrolled in conservation reserve programs. In 2016, Minnesota registered three new dicamba products (XtendiMax, Engenia, and FeXapan) for OTT application to DT soybeans to control broadleaf weeds such as pigweeds (Amaranthus spp.), ragweeds (Ambrosia spp.), horseweed (Conyza spp.), and Kochia spp. Prior to 2016, dicamba was registered for pre-plant and pre-emergence applications in conventional soybeans, Roundup Ready soybeans, and Liberty Link soybeans. New DT soybeans are tolerant to dicamba and glyphosate herbicides.

In 2017, the MDA received 249 complaints of off-site dicamba damage. To curb off-site movement, the MDA set June 20 as the annual application cutoff date for registered dicamba products from 2018 to 2020. This date was based on research and pesticide misuse complaints. In October 2020, EPA set June 30 as the application cutoff date on federal labels for OTT dicamba applications to DT soybeans. In 2022, the MDA worked with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the registrants of the three dicamba products to include the date and temperature cutoff restrictions on the product labels. On February 6, 2024, the U.S. District Court of Arizona vacated the 2020 federal registrations of OTT dicamba products for soybeans, XtendiMax® (EPA Reg. No. 264-1210), Engenia® (EPA Reg. No. 7969-472), and Tavium® (EPA Reg. No. 100-1623), making their sale or distribution illegal in the United States after June 12, 2024. As a result of the court decision, OTT dicamba products were no longer registered for use in Minnesota in 2025.

Following the 2024 court ruling, the pesticide registrants submitted new product proposals that include OTT application of dicamba on DT soybeans. The revised labels proposed new use patterns and stricter restrictions, including reduced application rates and limited over-the-top use in soybeans, aimed at reducing off-target movement and preventing crop damage. On February 6, 2026, three dicamba products, Engenia® (EPA Reg. No. 7969-507, BASF), Stryax™ (EPA Reg. No. 264-1241, Bayer), and Tavium® Plus VaporGrip Technology (EPA Reg. No. 100-1753, Syngenta) received federal registration and subsequently were registered for use in Minnesota. These products are approved for use on DT soybeans and DT cotton only.

Non-agricultural applications of dicamba include uses on residential lawns and on golf course turf throughout the state. Engenia®, Stryax™, and Tavium® are not approved for these uses.

The MDA tracks the sale of pesticide active ingredients in the state. The graph below shows annual dicamba sales in Minnesota between 1996 and 2024. Dicamba sales data are pooled for all forms of dicamba and reported as the pounds of dicamba acid equivalents (a.e.) sold. Sales data are available through the Pesticide Sales database.

Bar graph of the pounds of dicamba active ingredient sold annually in Minnesota from 1996 to 2024. A peak occurred in 1998 with approximately 1.28 million pounds sold and preceded to decline until 2009 with approximately 180 thousand pounds sold. Sales increased from 2009 until a second peak occurred in 2020 with approximately 1.55 million pounds sold and has been declining since 2020. In 2024, sales were approximately 853 thousand pounds.

Toxicity

The various salts of dicamba are considered to have a similar toxicity to dicamba acid. Furthermore, Dicamba salts are rapidly transformed into the acid form in the environment. Therefore, toxicity information is listed for dicamba acid.

Dicamba has a low acute toxicity via oral, dermal, and inhalation routes. It is an eye and dermal irritant, but it is not a skin sensitizer.

Human Health Values for Dicamba Acid. Data from US EPA1 and the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH).

Population Adjusted Dose (PAD)Acute=0.29 mg/kg/day
Chronic=0.04 mg/kg/day
Cancer EffectNot likely to be
carcinogenic to humans
MDH Health Risk Limit (HRL)
(chronic, 1993)
200 µg ae/L

Dicamba toxicity is low for aquatic organisms, mammals, and honeybees, and it is moderately toxic to birds. Non-target plants exposed to dicamba may be damaged by this herbicide.

Dicamba acid toxicity values for aquatic and terrestrial organisms. Data from US EPA2

Aquatic OrganismToxicity ValuesToxicity Level
Freshwater fishAcute LC50 = 28 mg ae/L
Chronic NOAEC = N/A
Slightly toxic
Freshwater invertebratesAcute EC50 > 50 mg ae/L
Chronic NOAEC = No data
Practically
non-toxic
Aquatic plantsVascular EC50 = N/A
Nonvascular EC50 = 0.493 mg ae/L
 
Most Sensitive Aquatic Life Benchmark (ALB)*61 µg/L (nonvascular plants) 

 

Terrestrial OrganismToxicity ValuesToxicity Level
MammalsAcute oral LD50 = 2,740 mg ae/L
Chronic NOAEC = N/A
Practically non-toxic
BirdsAcute oral LC50 = 188 mg ae/LModerately toxic
Honey beeAcute contact LD50 > 90.65 µg ae/beePractically non-toxic

*ALB value based on toxicity data from US EPA3.

Dicamba in the Environment

Dicamba is quickly biodegraded in soil under aerobic conditions (with oxygen) but is more persistent under anaerobic conditions (without oxygen). It is not likely to leach to groundwater due to its fast degradation; however, dicamba may reach surface water via run-off, spray drift during application, or vapor drift. Vapor drift from the volatilization of dicamba can result in injury of nearby non-target plants.

Dicamba salts are rapidly transformed into the acid form in the environment; therefore, properties are listed for dicamba acid.

Water Solubility6100 mg/L
Dissociation ConstantpKa = 1.9
AdsorptionKoc = 3.45 - 21.1 mL/goc (mean = 13.4)
Soil MetabolismAerobic half-life = 18 days
Anaerobic half-life = no data
Photolysisno data
Aquatic MetabolismAerobic half-life = 72.9 days
Anaerobic half-life = 423 days
PhotolysisHalf-life = 105 days
HydrolysisStable
VolatilizationVapor pressure (25°C) = 3.41 x 10-5 torr
Henry's Law constant = 1.79 x 10-8 atm m3/mol

3,6-dichlorosalicylic acid (DCSA) is the major degradate, or breakdown product, of dicamba. Because DCSA is primarily formed in plants, the EPA does not expect DCSA to reach groundwater at levels that would be of concern. However, DCSA is more toxic than the parent compound to certain species of birds and mammals; thus, there could be potential for adverse effects to certain species of birds and mammals. Mitigations are imposed on registration to alleviate these risks. Other minor degradates of dicamba include 3, 6-dichlorogentisic acid (DCGA) and 5-OH-dicamba.

Dicamba product labels include environmental hazard statements and language may vary among products. See individual product labels for full list of environmental hazards and spray drift management restrictions or recommendations. Always read the label before applying a pesticide.

References

  1. US EPA Dicamba and Dicamba BAPMA Salt: Human-Health Risk Assessment for Proposed Section 3 New Uses on Dicamba-tolerant Cotton and Soybean (2016). [Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0223-0002]
  2. US EPA Problem Formulation for the Environmental Fate, Ecological Risk, and Drinking Water Assessments in Support of the Registration Review of Dicamba (2016). [Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0223-0004]
  3. US EPA Ecological Risk Assessment for Dicamba DGA Salt and its degradate, 3,6-dichlorosalicylic acid (DSCA), for the Proposed Post-Emergence New Use on Dicamba-Tolerant Cotton (2016). [Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0187-0005]