Members and Alternates: Dan Benson, Gary Prescher, Kevin Kruise, Grant Anderson, Ryan Kelbrandts, Steve Commerford, Mark Bloomquist, Bryce Nelson, Bob Lindeman, Dan Schmitt, Keith Allen, Jeff Kosek*, David Kee, Mark Jossund
Others: Dan Kaiser, Paul McDivitt, Jack Wilcox, Tamara Benjamin, Jeff Coulter, Jeff Vetsch, Mike Schmitt, Carl Rosen, Matt Wiebers, Fabian Fernandez
MDA staff: Margaret Wagner, Russ Derickson
Bruce Montgomery opened the meeting at 9:03am with a quick review of new AFREC project proposal that were received by the due date of Nov. 23
- 20 projects – 15 continuation projects and 5 new projects with a funding request total of $1.07 million
- Reviewed meeting with Tom Petersen, Commissioner of Agriculture:
- Petersen says AFREC will have our work cut for us
- There is plenty of time (2 legislative sessions) to get AFREC reauthorized
- He suggested AFREC membership groups ask for a legislative hearing in 2023
- He suggested a AFREC report like MDA’s 2015 report be completed again
- He liked idea of support letters from commodity groups
- He suggested showing the water quality perspective for urban legislators along with demonstrated value
- AFREC can be an urban-rural issue not necessarily a political issue
Project presentations by: Jeff Coulter, Carl Rosen, Matt Weibers, and Dan Kaiser
Margaret Wagner updated the Council on the latest available dollars for possible allocation at the January grant selection meeting. The current AFREC balance is $1,229,858.
Project presentations by: Jeff Vetsch, Fabian Fernandez, Mkie Schmitt
Grant Anderson – led a discussion on AFREC reauthorization
- Grant gave his legislative reauthorization perspective from meeting with Petersen
- suggested either AFREC or commodity groups request legislative update hearings
- suggested each AFREC member group have internal discussion on their comfort level regarding reauthorization
- suggested creating support letter from each member group
- Self-imposed fee shouldn’t be political issue
- Tonnage fee vs percentage of fertilizer sales to fund AFREC (CA only state with % based funding)
- Keep AFREC language the same – easier to pass
- Ask legislature to fund additional research beyond AFREC collected fees with budget surplus
- We need to lean on each member group lobbyist to help with AFREC reauthorization
- Which year legislative session should AFREC move for reauthorization?
- Be careful about what you ask for – things can blow up in your face if it goes awry
- Don’t stir the pot too much
- AFREC tonnage fee has been flat since the start in 2008
- The legislature likes public-private collaborations
- Suggest to legislature to fund parallel research funding to complement existing AFREC research (manure was given as an example – it is related to fertility but is not commercial fertilizer)
Motion by Steve Commerford , second by Mark Jossund “…. to direct the ROC (Bruce Montgomery) to create an AFREC legislative report similar to one created by the MDA in 2015.” - Motion passed.
Motion by Keith Allen, second by Ryan Kelbrant “…to grant ex officio AFREC membership to the North Harvest Bean Council”. Motion passed*.
Meeting adjourned by acclamation by AFREC Chair Grant Anderson at 4:29 pm
Members and Alternates: Dan Benson, Gary Prescher, Kevin Kruise, Grant Anderson, Ryan Kelbrandts, Steve Commerford, Mark Bloomquist, Bryce Nelson, Bob Lindeman, Dan Schmitt, Keith Allen, Jeff Kosek*, David Kee, Mark Jossund
Others: Dan Kaiser, Paul McDivitt, Jack Wilcox, Tamara Benjamin, Jeff Coulter, Jeff Vetsch, Mike Schmitt, Carl Rosen, Matt Wiebers, Fabian Fernandez
MDA staff: Margaret Wagner, Russ Derickson
Bruce Montgomery opened the meeting at 9:03am with a quick review of new AFREC project proposal that were received by the due date of Nov. 23
- 20 projects – 15 continuation projects and 5 new projects with a funding request total of $1.07 million
- Reviewed meeting with Tom Petersen, Commissioner of Agriculture:
- Petersen says AFREC will have our work cut for us
- There is plenty of time (2 legislative sessions) to get AFREC reauthorized
- He suggested AFREC membership groups ask for a legislative hearing in 2023
- He suggested a AFREC report like MDA’s 2015 report be completed again
- He liked idea of support letters from commodity groups
- He suggested showing the water quality perspective for urban legislators along with demonstrated value
- AFREC can be an urban-rural issue not necessarily a political issue
Project presentations by: Jeff Coulter, Carl Rosen, Matt Weibers, and Dan Kaiser
Margaret Wagner updated the Council on the latest available dollars for possible allocation at the January grant selection meeting. The current AFREC balance is $1,229,858.
Project presentations by: Jeff Vetsch, Fabian Fernandez, Mkie Schmitt
Grant Anderson – led a discussion on AFREC reauthorization
- Grant gave his legislative reauthorization perspective from meeting with Petersen
- suggested either AFREC or commodity groups request legislative update hearings
- suggested each AFREC member group have internal discussion on their comfort level regarding reauthorization
- suggested creating support letter from each member group
- Self-imposed fee shouldn’t be political issue
- Tonnage fee vs percentage of fertilizer sales to fund AFREC (CA only state with % based funding)
- Keep AFREC language the same – easier to pass
- Ask legislature to fund additional research beyond AFREC collected fees with budget surplus
- We need to lean on each member group lobbyist to help with AFREC reauthorization
- Which year legislative session should AFREC move for reauthorization?
- Be careful about what you ask for – things can blow up in your face if it goes awry
- Don’t stir the pot too much
- AFREC tonnage fee has been flat since the start in 2008
- The legislature likes public-private collaborations
- Suggest to legislature to fund parallel research funding to complement existing AFREC research (manure was given as an example – it is related to fertility but is not commercial fertilizer)
Motion by Steve Commerford , second by Mark Jossund “…. to direct the ROC (Bruce Montgomery) to create an AFREC legislative report similar to one created by the MDA in 2015.” - Motion passed.
Motion by Keith Allen, second by Ryan Kelbrant “…to grant ex officio AFREC membership to the North Harvest Bean Council”. Motion passed*.
Meeting adjourned by acclamation by AFREC Chair Grant Anderson at 4:29 pm
Agricultural Statistics
651-728-3113
USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) works in partnership with the MDA to provide Minnesota farmers, agribusinesses, government, and the general public with accurate data on major crops and livestock, farm income, farm costs and returns, and other special agricultural information. The NASS Minnesota Field Office measures the current and potential food supply by collection, analysis, and publication of agricultural statistics at both the state and county level. Reports are available on the NASS website.
Agricultural Statistics
651-728-3113
USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) works in partnership with the MDA to provide Minnesota farmers, agribusinesses, government, and the general public with accurate data on major crops and livestock, farm income, farm costs and returns, and other special agricultural information. The NASS Minnesota Field Office measures the current and potential food supply by collection, analysis, and publication of agricultural statistics at both the state and county level. Reports are available on the NASS website.
The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), University of Minnesota (UMN), and members of the Statewide Cooperative Partnership for Local and Regional Markets have concluded a three-year project to collect baseline data on Minnesota’s local and regional agricultural markets. The data, along with a new strategic framework for market development, are now available for public use.
“We are grateful for the many partners that played a role in the Statewide Cooperative Partnership over the last three years,” said Minnesota Agriculture Commissioner Thom Petersen. “Never before have we had this level of information to guide our work on local and regional markets. The data and strategic framework that came out of this project provide us with new perspectives on how we can equitably support farmers and producers, retailers, public institutions, and consumers in Minnesota.”
Funded by a three-year grant from the USDA Federal State Marketing Improvement Program (FSMIP), the MDA, UMN, and over 40 partner organizations surveyed Minnesota producers, supply chain partners, and consumers in 2022 to supplement data from the USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service Agricultural Census.
“The data from our surveys and outreach help tell a more holistic story of the experiences of small and medium-sized farmers in Minnesota and pathways to effectively support them, in a structured way for the first time,” said Dr. Hikaru Peterson, the lead researcher for the project and a professor of applied economics in the UMN College of Food, Agricultural, and Natural Resource Sciences. “We look forward to using these findings to expand collaborative efforts to strengthen Minnesota’s local and regional markets.”
Thanks to outreach efforts of partners around the state, the producer survey reached many small, mid-sized and emerging farmers not previously represented in Minnesota’s agricultural data. Of the 497 Minnesota producers who completed the survey, only 37% were represented in the 2017 Census of Agriculture. The supply chain survey and consumer survey collected additional information to better understand purchasing factors, preference and demand for Minnesota products, and barriers to buying local.
The Partnership used data from all three surveys to develop a framework of seven priority areas and twenty strategies for building market opportunities for Minnesota producers, supply chains, and consumers. The priority areas include procedural equity; relationship building with tribal nations; outreach, education, and engagement; and built and organizational infrastructure.
Examples of specific strategies under the seven priority areas include:
- Provide more technical assistance, training, and information for emerging farmers that are culturally appropriate and offered in multiple languages;
- Sustain and expand programming aimed at getting more local food into institutions, retail stores, regional distributors, and places where consumers already shop; and
- Collaborate with USDA to increase producer participation in the Census of Agriculture, and identify and invest in ways to collect supplemental data every few years that is needed to support local and regional market development in Minnesota.
The full data reports and action framework can be accessed through the Statewide Cooperative Partnerships website. The MDA and UMN also hosted a webinar to introduce the findings, which can be viewed on the MDA’s YouTube channel.
The Statewide Cooperative Partnership will continue to meet regularly to discuss local and regional market data and needs, pursue collaborative approaches to market development and support, and nurture relationships across our food system. These meetings are open to all who are interested in supporting and expanding this work.
###
Media Contact
Logan Schumacher, MDA Communications
651-201-6193
Logan.Schumacher@state.mn.us