Safe drinking water is a concern for all Minnesotans.
Members and Alternates: Dan Benson, Gary Prescher, Kevin Kruise, Grant Anderson, Ryan Kelbrandts, Steve Commerford, Mark Bloomquist, Bryce Nelson, Bob Lindeman, Dan Schmitt, Keith Allen, Jeff Kosek*, David Kee, Mark Jossund
Others: Dan Kaiser, Paul McDivitt, Jack Wilcox, Tamara Benjamin, Jeff Coulter, Jeff Vetsch, Mike Schmitt, Carl Rosen, Matt Wiebers, Fabian Fernandez
MDA staff: Margaret Wagner, Russ Derickson
Bruce Montgomery opened the meeting at 9:03am with a quick review of new AFREC project proposal that were received by the due date of Nov. 23
- 20 projects – 15 continuation projects and 5 new projects with a funding request total of $1.07 million
- Reviewed meeting with Tom Petersen, Commissioner of Agriculture:
- Petersen says AFREC will have our work cut for us
- There is plenty of time (2 legislative sessions) to get AFREC reauthorized
- He suggested AFREC membership groups ask for a legislative hearing in 2023
- He suggested a AFREC report like MDA’s 2015 report be completed again
- He liked idea of support letters from commodity groups
- He suggested showing the water quality perspective for urban legislators along with demonstrated value
- AFREC can be an urban-rural issue not necessarily a political issue
Project presentations by: Jeff Coulter, Carl Rosen, Matt Weibers, and Dan Kaiser
Margaret Wagner updated the Council on the latest available dollars for possible allocation at the January grant selection meeting. The current AFREC balance is $1,229,858.
Project presentations by: Jeff Vetsch, Fabian Fernandez, Mkie Schmitt
Grant Anderson – led a discussion on AFREC reauthorization
- Grant gave his legislative reauthorization perspective from meeting with Petersen
- suggested either AFREC or commodity groups request legislative update hearings
- suggested each AFREC member group have internal discussion on their comfort level regarding reauthorization
- suggested creating support letter from each member group
- Self-imposed fee shouldn’t be political issue
- Tonnage fee vs percentage of fertilizer sales to fund AFREC (CA only state with % based funding)
- Keep AFREC language the same – easier to pass
- Ask legislature to fund additional research beyond AFREC collected fees with budget surplus
- We need to lean on each member group lobbyist to help with AFREC reauthorization
- Which year legislative session should AFREC move for reauthorization?
- Be careful about what you ask for – things can blow up in your face if it goes awry
- Don’t stir the pot too much
- AFREC tonnage fee has been flat since the start in 2008
- The legislature likes public-private collaborations
- Suggest to legislature to fund parallel research funding to complement existing AFREC research (manure was given as an example – it is related to fertility but is not commercial fertilizer)
Motion by Steve Commerford , second by Mark Jossund “…. to direct the ROC (Bruce Montgomery) to create an AFREC legislative report similar to one created by the MDA in 2015.” - Motion passed.
Motion by Keith Allen, second by Ryan Kelbrant “…to grant ex officio AFREC membership to the North Harvest Bean Council”. Motion passed*.
Meeting adjourned by acclamation by AFREC Chair Grant Anderson at 4:29 pm
Members and Alternates: Dan Benson, Gary Prescher, Kevin Kruise, Grant Anderson, Ryan Kelbrandts, Steve Commerford, Mark Bloomquist, Bryce Nelson, Bob Lindeman, Dan Schmitt, Keith Allen, Jeff Kosek*, David Kee, Mark Jossund
Others: Dan Kaiser, Paul McDivitt, Jack Wilcox, Tamara Benjamin, Jeff Coulter, Jeff Vetsch, Mike Schmitt, Carl Rosen, Matt Wiebers, Fabian Fernandez
MDA staff: Margaret Wagner, Russ Derickson
Bruce Montgomery opened the meeting at 9:03am with a quick review of new AFREC project proposal that were received by the due date of Nov. 23
- 20 projects – 15 continuation projects and 5 new projects with a funding request total of $1.07 million
- Reviewed meeting with Tom Petersen, Commissioner of Agriculture:
- Petersen says AFREC will have our work cut for us
- There is plenty of time (2 legislative sessions) to get AFREC reauthorized
- He suggested AFREC membership groups ask for a legislative hearing in 2023
- He suggested a AFREC report like MDA’s 2015 report be completed again
- He liked idea of support letters from commodity groups
- He suggested showing the water quality perspective for urban legislators along with demonstrated value
- AFREC can be an urban-rural issue not necessarily a political issue
Project presentations by: Jeff Coulter, Carl Rosen, Matt Weibers, and Dan Kaiser
Margaret Wagner updated the Council on the latest available dollars for possible allocation at the January grant selection meeting. The current AFREC balance is $1,229,858.
Project presentations by: Jeff Vetsch, Fabian Fernandez, Mkie Schmitt
Grant Anderson – led a discussion on AFREC reauthorization
- Grant gave his legislative reauthorization perspective from meeting with Petersen
- suggested either AFREC or commodity groups request legislative update hearings
- suggested each AFREC member group have internal discussion on their comfort level regarding reauthorization
- suggested creating support letter from each member group
- Self-imposed fee shouldn’t be political issue
- Tonnage fee vs percentage of fertilizer sales to fund AFREC (CA only state with % based funding)
- Keep AFREC language the same – easier to pass
- Ask legislature to fund additional research beyond AFREC collected fees with budget surplus
- We need to lean on each member group lobbyist to help with AFREC reauthorization
- Which year legislative session should AFREC move for reauthorization?
- Be careful about what you ask for – things can blow up in your face if it goes awry
- Don’t stir the pot too much
- AFREC tonnage fee has been flat since the start in 2008
- The legislature likes public-private collaborations
- Suggest to legislature to fund parallel research funding to complement existing AFREC research (manure was given as an example – it is related to fertility but is not commercial fertilizer)
Motion by Steve Commerford , second by Mark Jossund “…. to direct the ROC (Bruce Montgomery) to create an AFREC legislative report similar to one created by the MDA in 2015.” - Motion passed.
Motion by Keith Allen, second by Ryan Kelbrant “…to grant ex officio AFREC membership to the North Harvest Bean Council”. Motion passed*.
Meeting adjourned by acclamation by AFREC Chair Grant Anderson at 4:29 pm
Demand is high for the Minnesota Department of Agriculture’s (MDA) new Soil Health Financial Assistance Grant.
The MDA recently awarded 81 grants to individual producers, producer groups, and local governments to purchase or retrofit soil health equipment. The grants total over $2.35 million.
Interest far outpaced available funding. The MDA received 284 applications for $8.4 million in requests – more than three times the money in this round of grants.
The grants will provide up to 50% cost-share for equipment and parts, up to a cap of $50,000.
“Given the amount of interest in this program, we see Minnesota farmers want to invest in healthy soils that provide important benefits to water quality and our other natural resources,” said MDA Commissioner Thom Petersen. “Specialized equipment and machinery can be a financial barrier for most producers trying to implement soil health practices. Yet we can offset costs through the Soil Health Financial Assistance Grant, helping to expand the number of Minnesota farmers and acres engaged in soil health activities.”
The equipment provided by these grants is estimated to be used on more than 141,000 acres annually across Minnesota (SEE MAP). The soil health practices on those acres include cover cropping, no-till planting, strip tillage, incorporation of perennials into cropping systems, low-disturbance nutrient application, and more. The most common types of equipment noted in the grant awards were no-till drills (21) and strip tillage equipment (12).
This is the first full round of the Soil Health Financial Assistance Grant. A pilot program in early 2023 awarded $475,000 to 16 individuals and organizations across 15 counties. The pilot program received more than 230 applications for more than $6.5 million – over 13 times the available funding.
Applications for the next round of the Soil Health Financial Assistance Grant will open in August.
###
Media Contact
Allen Sommerfeld, MDA Communications
651-201-6185
Allen.Sommerfeld@state.mn.us