The MDA is responsible for the implementation, compliance monitoring, and enforcement of the federal Worker Protection Sta
Yes. As long as the person or entity purchasing the equipment is in Minnesota and the equipment will be used in Minnesota, it can be purchased from somewhere out of state.
Yes, you can include equipment shipping costs in your cost estimate when you submit your application.
You can submit an application for any equipment not listed under the “ineligible expenses” section of the RFP. Rather than MDA providing a finite list of eligible equipment, we are asking that applicants present an explanation for how the equipment they want to buy is necessary to advance soil health on their operation.
Applicants must be owners or lessees of farmland in Minnesota. It must be the owner or lessee of farmland involved in a given operation who applies for a grant on behalf of that operation. Local government units (including cities, towns, counties, soil and water conservation districts, Tribal nations, and joint powers boards) do not have to be owners or lessees of farmland to apply.
No money can be spent on the equipment until the grant is awarded and a grant contract agreement is signed by the Commissioner of Agriculture.
No, labor incurred for any purpose cannot be reimbursed under this program.
No, labor incurred for any purpose cannot be reimbursed under this program.
Is labor an eligible expense?
No, labor incurred for any purpose cannot be reimbursed under this program.
Request for Proposal1.7 MB
February 20, 2025
A newly published study by researchers at the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the University of Minnesota’s Minnesota Geological Survey, and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources reveals new information about the age of groundwater in the state’s distinctive Driftless Area of southeastern Minnesota.
The peer-reviewed study examined current concentrations of a discontinued row-crop herbicide, popular in the 1970s and 1980s, in springs and wells. Researchers then compared the data against the historical use of the herbicide. Researchers combined those results with independent age-dating methods to reveal a mixture of groundwater ages, ranging from 10 to 40 years old in many of the region’s shallower springs and wells, to thousands of years old in deeper aquifers.
Groundwater ages were then combined with historical land use data and climate information to help interpret nitrate concentration trends between 2000-2021 for nearly 1,200 well, spring, and stream monitoring locations.
The results showed that most monitoring sites with elevated nitrate had groundwater less than 20 years old. Nitrate levels in this water were either decreasing or relatively steady. Improved agricultural practices may have contributed to these results. Dilution from record-setting precipitation over the past two decades could also be a factor. Groundwater that is several decades older typically had lower nitrate concentrations, but a higher likelihood of increasing trends as the nitrate-contaminated water moves into deeper aquifer systems.
The authors highlight that although it may take decades to measure the impact of clean water activities in certain aquifers, the cumulative effect of best management practices implemented today will help reduce the amount of nitrate entering groundwater over the long term.
The study’s findings are available in the Hydrogeology Journal(https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10040-024-02871-2).
Funding for the project was provided by Minnesota’s Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment, MDA’s Pesticide Regulatory Account, Root River Field to Stream Partnership, the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund, and legislative appropriation to the Minnesota Geological Survey, and the University of Minnesota.
###
Media Contact
Allen Sommerfeld, MDA Communications
651-201-6185
Allen.Sommerfeld@state.mn.us
How can a Dairy Profit Team help me?
An on-farm dairy profit team can help you:
