• facebook
  • twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS feed
  • 651-201-6000
  • 800-967-2474
  • 711 TTY
  • PARKING

NodeFire Save Document
Home > Ag Chemicals & Fertilizers > Spills & Safety > Incident Response Unit > Guidance Documents > Remedial Investigation Work Plan (GD9)

Guidance Document 9 - Remedial Investigation Work Plan


Printable Version (PDF: 145 KB / 8 pages) 

Persons storing or who have stored, distributed, or used agricultural chemicals may have had releases of these chemicals into the environment.  To determine if such sites are contaminated and the level of concern, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) requires a Remedial Investigation (RI).  Corrective actions may also be required, if appropriate.

The objectives of an RI are to identify the:

  1. likely sources of contamination;
  2. extent and magnitude of contamination in soil, groundwater, and/or other media;
  3. actual and potential impacts relating to the contamination; and
  4. information needed to design any necessary corrective actions.

A remedial investigation work plan (RI Work Plan) describing how the RI will be conducted must be submitted to the MDA for approval prior to implementation.  MDA approval of the RI Work Plan is necessary for the Agricultural Chemical Response and Reimbursement Account Board to approve reimbursement of costs associated with the investigation and any subsequent cleanup (ACRRA.001 Reimbursement of Costs for Agricultural Chemical Incident Cleanups:  ACRRA).  Once the RI Work Plan is approved, investigation activities can proceed.  Remedial investigation results must be documented in an RI Report and Corrective Action Plan (CAP).  A CAP may be required to address or mitigate agricultural chemical contamination impacts (GD10 Agricultural Chemical Incident Remedial Investigation Report and Corrective Action Plan).

APPROACH TO REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONS

The following general procedures apply to agricultural chemical incident investigations.  MDA staff can modify any of these procedures based on site specific considerations.  Environmental consultants and responsible/voluntary parties are encouraged to propose modifications that will achieve effective results while reducing project costs.

Investigations at agricultural chemical facilities should be conducted in a flexible stepped approach whereby the results of preceding steps are used as rationale and justification for subsequent steps. With MDA staff approval, steps may be modified, combined or conducted concurrently at different locations on one facility to best suit the needs of a particular site.  All work must be conducted in a safe manner and in accordance with all appropriate local, state, and federal rules and regulations.

STEP I.  RI Work Plan Development

The main objectives of the RI Work Plan are to identify and document:

  • potential source areas and chemicals of concern;
  • proposed methods and procedures that will be employed to investigate potential source areas and chemicals of concern; and
  • how potential receptors and migration pathways will be identified and investigated.

Attachment 1 is a RI Work Plan outline.

Prior to the submission of the RI Work Plan, the Agricultural Chemical Environmental Site Assessment (AgESA) must be completed in accordance with Guidance Document 14 (GD14 The Agricultural Environmental Site Assessment). After the AgESA has been received and deemed sufficient by MDA staff, the consultant and MDA staff shall visit the Site to identify sampling areas and site specific concerns or restrictions.

The RI Work Plan must document the results of the site history investigation discussed above. The site history results shall be used to provide the rationale and justification for selecting (or not selecting) potential source areas and chemicals of concern that will be investigated through further sampling and analysis. 

The RI Work Plan shall discuss how the information necessary to complete the Contamination Impacts Survey (CIS; see Attachment 2) will be obtained and evaluated.  The methods and procedures that are to be utilized to collect remedial investigation data must be identified and discussed in detail.  MDA staff will not approve a RI Work Plan that only references MDA technical guidance documents when discussing methods and procedures. Any deviations from MDA technical guidance documents should be identified along with the consultant’s rationale and justification for the proposed deviations.  In addition, the consultant’s Standard Operating Procedures for collecting and handling samples must be included as appendices in the RI Work Plan.

STEP II.  Investigation of the Likely Contaminated Areas

Once the historical and current use of the property have been evaluated and potential areas of concern have been identified (STEP I), those areas shall be proposed for investigation by the collection and analysis of soil, groundwater, surface water and/or other samples. Several phases of field work may be required to address the objectives of the RI as noted above. MDA staff should be notified at least one week prior to the implementation of field work and may choose to observe the field work and split samples without prior notice.

A) Soil Sampling:
FOCUS:  Investigation activities should focus on high risk areas for agricultural chemical contamination identified in STEP I.  These areas include:

  • Any place where small packaged, minibulk, or bulk quantities of agricultural chemicals were delivered, stored, mixed or loaded;
  • The interior of any earthen dike;
  • Fertilizer impregnation tower area;
  • Load-in and load-out areas;
  • Anhydrous ammonia loading areas and piping;
  • Equipment parking areas;
  • Stained areas;
  • Obvious dead, damaged or barren vegetation spots;
  • Areas associated with previous spills;
  • Pesticide container storage locations;
  • Scale pits;
  • Locations where pesticide containers have been burned;
  • Areas where runoff occurs;
  • Water fill sites;
  • Seed treatment areas;
  • Equipment repair areas and/or shops;
  • Fertilizer production areas (e.g. mobile phosphate reactors); and
  • Beneath the floor of dry fertilizer buildings if the floor is cracked.

SOIL SAMPLING APPROACH:  Sampling consists of at least one surface composite sample, one subsurface composite sample and one subsurface discrete sample from each high risk area and other potential contaminant source areas on the site.

Composite samples in each high risk area should consist of 3 to 6 evenly-spaced sub-samples from an area roughly 15 feet in diameter.  Surface composite samples are to be taken 0 to 6 inches below any surficial gravel.  Subsurface composites should be collected at a depth of 2 to 2.5 feet below ground surface (bgs).

One discrete "grab" sample from a depth of 4.5 to 5 feet bgs should be collected near the center or close to the probable source in each surface composite area.

For more information see MDA guidance document GD11 Soil Sampling Guidance.

SOIL SAMPLE COLLECTION:  Samples may be collected by any suitable sampling method such as push probes, hand auger, solid stem auger, hollow stem auger or test trenching.  The RI Work Plan shall specify exact sampling procedure to ensure the sample is representative of the specified depth interval and not contaminated by soil falling in from above.  Sampling at depths within areas previously sampled or excavated shall be noted in the RI Work Plan.

DEEP SOIL SAMPLING:  A deeper soil boring to a depth of 25 feet or the water table, whichever is less, generally will be required to evaluate the threat of contamination reaching the groundwater, the vertical extent of contamination, and/or to evaluate subsurface stratigraphic formations.  Deeper borings may be required at some sites.  Scale pit areas require deeper soil sampling immediately.  Soil samples should be collected from six (6)-inch intervals every two (2) feet, at changes in lithology, and at the water table.  Classify soil samples in accordance with ASTM methods D 2487 or D 2488.  Any soil samples submitted for laboratory analyses should be held under proper chain of custody and analyzed according to MDA staff preapproval.

Soil borings should not be a conduit for the vertical migration of contamination.  Borings should not penetrate through confining layers below saturated zones or connect aquifers and shall be immediately grouted in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) water well construction code (Minnesota Rules Chapter 4725).

SOIL SAMPLE ANALYSIS:  Composite samples from the 2-2.5 foot interval are usually analyzed immediately, unless otherwise requested by MDA staff.  The 2-2.5 foot interval is analyzed first, in high risk areas, because past experience suggests that the surface sample in high risk areas is very likely to be contaminated. The surface composite and 4.5 to 5 foot discrete samples are to be held frozen under proper chain of custody for long-term storage.

Analytical reports for the 2-2.5 foot samples, a summary table presenting the analytical results, the Laboratory Data Review Checklist (GD29), boring logs, a map showing sampling locations and a proposal for next steps, including the additional analyses of frozen samples, as applicable, should be forwarded to the MDA project staff by email within five (5) days upon receiving analytical results from the laboratory. MDA staff will then contact the consultant and responsible/voluntary party to discuss the analyses of frozen samples. If the 2-2.5 foot sample is found to be contaminated, the deep discrete sample (4.5-5 foot depth) is usually analyzed to determine the vertical extent of contamination.  MDA staff will accept analytical data from frozen samples properly stored for a period of up to six (6) months.

If the 2-2.5 foot sample interval collected from a high risk area is not contaminated, then the surface composite (i.e., 0-0.5 foot interval) is usually analyzed to determine if there is surface soil contamination. Proposals to analyze the deep discrete or the surface composite sample immediately along with the 2-2.5 foot interval will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

SOIL ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS: The MDA has standard analytical lists for use in pesticide incident investigations.  In general, most soil samples are analyzed for MDA List 1 pesticides (neutral extractables). See MDA guidance document GD26 Analytical Lists for Pesticide Incident Investigations.  Analysis of site-specific pesticides, based on the agricultural chemical inventory obtained during the AgESA for the Site, may also be required.  Nitrate-nitrogen and Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) analyses will be required in areas where fertilizer contamination is suspected.  If practicable, analytical costs may be reduced by targeting previously identified contaminants of concern.  However, confirmation sampling for the full MDA List 1 pesticide analytical suite will be required.

B) Groundwater Sampling:
FOCUS:  Monitoring wells may be required at sites depending on the extent and magnitude of contamination and site-specific hydrogeology.

MONITORING WELLS: A minimum of three wells are necessary to define the groundwater flow direction. At most facilities, four or more monitoring wells will be required to adequately evaluate groundwater beneath the facility.  Monitoring well locations, well design, well drilling methods, well development methods and well sampling methods must be reviewed and pre-approved by MDA staff.  Monitoring wells should be constructed with polyvinyl chloride (PVC), stainless steel or low carbon steel materials dependent on the contaminant(s) of concern being assessed. Monitoring wells intended to intercept the groundwater table or perched water should be constructed to allow for seasonal fluctuations in water levels.  Monitoring wells must comply with the MDH water well construction code (Minnesota Rules Chapter 4725).

Slug or plug tests that estimate the horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the screened formations should be performed once on select new monitoring wells. In order to obtain accurate results, slug or plug tests should must be conducted on undisturbed wells before water samples are collected. The slug or plug tests should be conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in the RI Work Plan.

POTABLE WELLS: Potable wells on and near the site should be sampled as soon as it appears that there is a reasonable likelihood that groundwater may be contaminated, based on the site hydrogeology, past practices and analytical data. This could be as early as the start of Step II. Contact MDA staff if there is any concern about potable wells and prior to sampling off-site wells.

For more information on groundwater sampling see MDA guidance document GD12 Groundwater Sampling Guidance.

C) Handling and Transport of Samples
All samples must be collected, transported and stored in accordance with applicable EPA, DOT and MDA approved procedures, including chain of custody.  Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) plans and analytical methods from commercial laboratories analyzing standard List 1, 2 & 3 compounds must be approved by MDA.  Lists of commercial laboratories with approved QA/QC plans are provided in MDA guidance document GD23 Pre-approved Commercial Laboratories: Fixed Base and Mobile.

Step III. Remedial Investigation Report

After field work is completed, an Agricultural Chemical Incident Remedial Investigation Report must be submitted to the MDA (GD10 Agricultural Chemical Incident Remedial Investigation Report and Corrective Action Plan).  If the RI activities completed do not accomplish the objectives of the RI Work Plan, additional field activities and reports may be necessary.  The CIS (Attachment 2) should be completed, submitted, and discussed in the RI Report.

The RI Report should be a comprehensive document. All data used, including geological logs, well construction logs, and laboratory data, should be reproduced in the appropriate tables and appendices, without referring to previous reports.

CLOSURE

Once the Site is investigated and remediated (if necessary) to MDA staff satisfaction, the project file will be closed. 

MDA Contact

651-201-6061 • Fax: 651-201-6112
Pesticide & Fertilizer Management Division